<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Small Business StuffSocialPress &#124; Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smme.socialpress.co.za/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za</link>
	<description>Chat about SMME issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 11:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Rudeness on the Increase? by Iain Robertson</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2011/05/11/is-rudeness-on-the-increase/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 11:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=80#comment-35</guid>
		<description>A good question, but should I really worry ? If they are as uncaring of their customers as to think that they can keep me waiting, then I am probably better 
off without whoever it is.

But how do I cancel?

The answer is that I must hold on once just to find out who they are, give them a mouthful, and then cancel whatever it is that I do with them.

If it is a salesman trying to sell me stuff, then the approach has even less sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good question, but should I really worry ? If they are as uncaring of their customers as to think that they can keep me waiting, then I am probably better<br />
off without whoever it is.</p>
<p>But how do I cancel?</p>
<p>The answer is that I must hold on once just to find out who they are, give them a mouthful, and then cancel whatever it is that I do with them.</p>
<p>If it is a salesman trying to sell me stuff, then the approach has even less sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Rudeness on the Increase? by John Brandow</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2011/05/11/is-rudeness-on-the-increase/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brandow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=80#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Just a question Ian. If you haven&#039;t actually spoken to them how do you know who it is that is going to loose you as a customer?  Just being funny this time of evening</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a question Ian. If you haven&#8217;t actually spoken to them how do you know who it is that is going to loose you as a customer?  Just being funny this time of evening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Officially Gatvol by bj steyn</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2011/03/02/officially-gatvol/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>bj steyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2011/03/02/officially-gatvol/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I read this on Piet Petoors blog.

S.A Government makes huge profits from crime.

Question: “What is the influence of crime on the S.A. Govt?”

Answer: Crime generates millions and millions of Rand’s for the SA Government Here are the facts….

Example 1: Take just one million home owners in Gauteng who pay for “armed crime reaction” (not crime prevention) where private security companies react AFTER the crime has taken place – no wonder they never make any arrests!

This service costs on average R250 p.m.

Therefore 1,000,000 x R240.00 x 12 months x 14% VAT, generates R403 million in tax revenue for the SA Govt!….

Example 2: A car thief steals a R500,000 car and receives between R10,000 and R30,000 for his deed.

The car owner is paid out by insurance and then purchases another similar vehicle, on which he pays 14% VAT of approx R70,000 as a direct result of crime.

Who profited the most?

The thief or the SA Govt?

We must begin with a mechanism whereby the SA Govt is forced to reconsider this unconstitutional and immoral practice of profiting from crime!

All South Africans should demand that all payments related to protection of life and property should be VAT free and Tax deductible! This principle should also apply to replacement of stolen property as well as estate duty. If a person dies as a result of crime we should also demand that estate duty not be paid. How much do you think the SA Govt. has made out of estate duty from the murders of 1300 South African farmers?

The S.A. Govt likes to compare us to overseas. Well overseas your safety and security is covered by your income tax and is tax deductible!

It is time that South Africans stood together and made the Govt. and public aware of the Govt’s “income” from crime. In the meantime crime is the goose that lays the golden egg.

Is it also not unreasonable to expect victims of violence and hijackings to pay their own medical costs? The Govt. should pay for these expenses as well as family counselling for victims!

Come on South Africa, ask the right questions and demand the right answers!

You could just delete this message or you could help make a difference. Send this to everyone you know – now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this on Piet Petoors blog.</p>
<p>S.A Government makes huge profits from crime.</p>
<p>Question: “What is the influence of crime on the S.A. Govt?”</p>
<p>Answer: Crime generates millions and millions of Rand’s for the SA Government Here are the facts….</p>
<p>Example 1: Take just one million home owners in Gauteng who pay for “armed crime reaction” (not crime prevention) where private security companies react AFTER the crime has taken place – no wonder they never make any arrests!</p>
<p>This service costs on average R250 p.m.</p>
<p>Therefore 1,000,000 x R240.00 x 12 months x 14% VAT, generates R403 million in tax revenue for the SA Govt!….</p>
<p>Example 2: A car thief steals a R500,000 car and receives between R10,000 and R30,000 for his deed.</p>
<p>The car owner is paid out by insurance and then purchases another similar vehicle, on which he pays 14% VAT of approx R70,000 as a direct result of crime.</p>
<p>Who profited the most?</p>
<p>The thief or the SA Govt?</p>
<p>We must begin with a mechanism whereby the SA Govt is forced to reconsider this unconstitutional and immoral practice of profiting from crime!</p>
<p>All South Africans should demand that all payments related to protection of life and property should be VAT free and Tax deductible! This principle should also apply to replacement of stolen property as well as estate duty. If a person dies as a result of crime we should also demand that estate duty not be paid. How much do you think the SA Govt. has made out of estate duty from the murders of 1300 South African farmers?</p>
<p>The S.A. Govt likes to compare us to overseas. Well overseas your safety and security is covered by your income tax and is tax deductible!</p>
<p>It is time that South Africans stood together and made the Govt. and public aware of the Govt’s “income” from crime. In the meantime crime is the goose that lays the golden egg.</p>
<p>Is it also not unreasonable to expect victims of violence and hijackings to pay their own medical costs? The Govt. should pay for these expenses as well as family counselling for victims!</p>
<p>Come on South Africa, ask the right questions and demand the right answers!</p>
<p>You could just delete this message or you could help make a difference. Send this to everyone you know – now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attacks on the Media under an Increasingly Autocratic Government by Anton Koekemoer</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/08/05/attacks-on-the-media-under-an-increasingly-autocratic-government/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Koekemoer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/08/05/attacks-on-the-media-under-an-increasingly-autocratic-government/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>“there is nothing to worry about, I don’t intend to do anything unlawful so they can do what they like”.

I think we will see changes happening when all the court cases starts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“there is nothing to worry about, I don’t intend to do anything unlawful so they can do what they like”.</p>
<p>I think we will see changes happening when all the court cases starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paypal in SA &#8211; Will it Work ? by Iain Robertson</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/02/15/paypal-in-sa-will-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=10#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hot off the press - FNB have hired the J&#039;Burg Turbine Hall on the 25Th March for a joint event with PayPal.  The subject matter has not been disclosed, so it might not be a launch.

The other rumour is that FNB want to link the eBucks system, the online currency that thinks it&#039;s a loyalty programme, with PayPal.  And all before we turn into Blatterland in June.

Keep you posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot off the press &#8211; FNB have hired the J&#8217;Burg Turbine Hall on the 25Th March for a joint event with PayPal.  The subject matter has not been disclosed, so it might not be a launch.</p>
<p>The other rumour is that FNB want to link the eBucks system, the online currency that thinks it&#8217;s a loyalty programme, with PayPal.  And all before we turn into Blatterland in June.</p>
<p>Keep you posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a Bunch of Hypocrites by Iain Robertson</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/02/18/what-a-bunch-of-hypocrites/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=36#comment-21</guid>
		<description>That is a point.  I would not like to be the wonk in the Sundumbili Sports Tavern switching of a Bafana Bafana game because they haven&#039;t paid the R50 000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a point.  I would not like to be the wonk in the Sundumbili Sports Tavern switching of a Bafana Bafana game because they haven&#8217;t paid the R50 000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a Bunch of Hypocrites by John Brandow</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/02/18/what-a-bunch-of-hypocrites/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>John Brandow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=36#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Not applicable to Julius Malema or shebeens - Who will police shebeens ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not applicable to Julius Malema or shebeens &#8211; Who will police shebeens ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a Bunch of Hypocrites by Iain Robertson</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/02/18/what-a-bunch-of-hypocrites/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=36#comment-19</guid>
		<description>A quick update.  It now appears that they are backtracking.  Spokesman Said &quot;clarified&quot; the situation by saying existing license holders need not apply, unless they intended charging for admission. 

So once again, entrepreneurs are being shafted by government red tape.  

At the worst cvase, a local charity or self-help group decide to do a bit of fund-raising.  They hire a venue,  put infrastructure in it for the local village to watch Bafana Bafana, and put up a bar to recoup their costs and make some money.  They pay R50 ooo.

Doesn&#039;t seem quite right to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick update.  It now appears that they are backtracking.  Spokesman Said &#8220;clarified&#8221; the situation by saying existing license holders need not apply, unless they intended charging for admission. </p>
<p>So once again, entrepreneurs are being shafted by government red tape.  </p>
<p>At the worst cvase, a local charity or self-help group decide to do a bit of fund-raising.  They hire a venue,  put infrastructure in it for the local village to watch Bafana Bafana, and put up a bar to recoup their costs and make some money.  They pay R50 ooo.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t seem quite right to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a Bunch of Hypocrites by Wayne Bisset</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/02/18/what-a-bunch-of-hypocrites/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Bisset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=36#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Oh, I am not allowed to say what I think about our present government. I saw Quatro Camp a long time back in Angola and that sort gave me a preview of what we see today. Quatro got 10 mins on the Truth and Retaliation Comity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I am not allowed to say what I think about our present government. I saw Quatro Camp a long time back in Angola and that sort gave me a preview of what we see today. Quatro got 10 mins on the Truth and Retaliation Comity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a Bunch of Hypocrites by Iain Robertson</title>
		<link>http://smme.socialpress.co.za/2010/02/18/what-a-bunch-of-hypocrites/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smme.socialpress.co.za/?p=36#comment-17</guid>
		<description>@Werner:  And therein lies the problem.  Government doesn&#039;t give a flying bottom emission about small business.    They make all the appropriate noises, set up the appropriate structures in such a way as they cannot function properly, and then return to schmoozing with their big buddies.

They seem incapable of grasping the simple fact that in any developed economy about 80% of economic activity comes from businesses with less than 30 employees.  Growth in the SA economy and hence employment will come in that sector, not by creating another Anglo or Barlows.

The less charitable answer is that they do not want to formalise the sector and bring it into SARS orbit in case they upset their political constituency.

It seems  that small business is there to be used as a purse whenever they need a bit of pocket change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Werner:  And therein lies the problem.  Government doesn&#8217;t give a flying bottom emission about small business.    They make all the appropriate noises, set up the appropriate structures in such a way as they cannot function properly, and then return to schmoozing with their big buddies.</p>
<p>They seem incapable of grasping the simple fact that in any developed economy about 80% of economic activity comes from businesses with less than 30 employees.  Growth in the SA economy and hence employment will come in that sector, not by creating another Anglo or Barlows.</p>
<p>The less charitable answer is that they do not want to formalise the sector and bring it into SARS orbit in case they upset their political constituency.</p>
<p>It seems  that small business is there to be used as a purse whenever they need a bit of pocket change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

